This series celebrates all the great information that exists in ArchivesAWARE!
This blog post originally published on March 28, 2018, seems especially necessary in today’s climate. Communicating effectively and succinctly about the value of archives is a skill we should all hone.
This post was authored by guest contributor Anna Trammell, Archival Operations and Reference Specialist at the University of Illinois Archives Research Center/Student Life and Culture Archives, and current member of SAA’s Committee on Public Awareness (COPA).
I’m at the airport waiting to board a plane when a fellow traveler strikes up a conversation. After we’ve commiserated about the shortcomings of the airlines and swapped details on destinations and reason for travel, I know what question is coming next: “So what do you do?” If you’re a new professional like me, you may remember your earlier responses to this question. Mine probably ended up somewhere between a frenetic rattling off of responsibilities and an apology. As the boarding began, I knew that my co-passenger had no idea what I did and was probably pretty certain I didn’t either.
Every encounter like this, whether it is with a stranger who you may never see again or another member of your own organization, is an opportunity to serve as an advocate for archives and archivists. We do really interesting things that will appeal to a wide variety of people. We can easily find ways to engage the public when given even the briefest opportunity to talk about our work. If I had a better response in my airport encounter, that interaction would have likely had no impact on my own position or institution. But I could have made that person aware of what archives are, what archivists do, and why our work is important. Having an effective elevator speech prepared can help make sure you clearly articulate this.
So what does a good archives elevator speech look like? Here are some tips to keep in mind as you begin to think about crafting your own brief pitch:
Skip the Details
An elevator speech should be concise (about 30-60 seconds). That doesn’t give you much time to grab the listener’s attention. Because every word counts, you won’t have time to dive into the particulars of your job. Keep it general. Hopefully, your successful speech will result in follow up questions from your listener, allowing you time to dive into more specific information about your own institution and role.
Focus On Your Listener
Consider your audience and adapt your speech accordingly. Are they wearing a Cubs baseball cap? Maybe you can grab their attention by mentioning that even sports teams rely on the work of archivists. Did they tell you that they are a student at a nearby university? Perhaps they’d be interested in the ways universities preserve student organization records or alumni papers. Listeners will remember a story, especially if it relates to their own interests. Find a way to center your speech on them.
Make it Personal
What really excites you about being an archivist? Engage your listener by sharing your enthusiasm about a particular aspect of archival work or your excitement over the ways archivists are tackling new demands in the 21st century.
SAA’s Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) created this handy guide to get you started.
Need more inspiration?
In 2007, SAA hosted an Elevator Speech Contest as part of American Archives Month. Lisa H. Lewis had the winning entry with this 28-word speech: “Archivists bring the past to the present. They’re records collectors and protectors, keepers of memory. They organize unique, historical materials, making them available for current and future research.”
On #AskAnArchivist Day 2017, Colleen McFarland Rademaker of the Corning Museum of Glass shared a video of her elevator speech:
On February 14th, 2025, the Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) offered a storytelling event called “Finding Aid to My Soul: For the Love of Archives.” This is one of the stories shared during that event.
Lipstick Links Us
If you were to read in a diary entry of mine from the winter of 2021 it would read like an angsty, Emo teenager’s, even though I was 32 at the time. I had spent eight incredible, but very tumultuous years working in animation and children’s television, which were definitely the epitome of the best of times and the worst of times. I burned out of that career hard and experienced what the kids today would call a quarter life crisis. I didn’t know what to do next, professionally speaking, and I guess you could say that I had some serious commitment issues. I felt really let down by the last career that I built for myself, and was worried about getting too attached to another one. So eventually, I moved 3,000 miles across the country to Boston to pursue a new career and enrolled in graduate program for library science at the height of the pandemic, as one does, because I felt like I just needed to commit to something. My family would probably be really horrified to hear me say this, because A, I told them otherwise, and B, I was putting all of my savings and then some into the endeavor. Given the timing, everyone was still caught in this weird haze coming out of isolation. We were all really skeptical of outings. It was made worse by the grayest, darkest winter I’d known in ages, and I was just really prone to second guessing all of the decisions that I’d made up to that point, including my new foray into the library and special collections worlds. I eventually got my first job at a library, though it was Schlesinger Library for the History of Women in America, at Harvard. I was a reading room assistant. I was helping researchers, paging materials from vaults and as part of the initial training exercise, my boss had me search for an item in the collection that was of interest to me.
I chose the diaries of a woman named Catherine Keane, who was described as a covert operative in Washington, DC and then London during World War Two. I think I was naively hoping for first hand accounts of spies sliding codes hidden in newspapers across London park benches, because there’s was, and definitely still is a part of me that absolutely loved the idea of that life and had such a curiosity about the people who lived it.
But before I got the chance to find out, I got sick. I got very, very sick. My sinuses felt like they were going to implode, and it was just the kind of sickness that made the loneliness even lonelier. I really want to reach out to my friends across the country, but thought I would just be a burden, so I didn’t. Of course, I was constantly checking for messages from them, even though I wasn’t reaching out to them at all. Everything was making me irritable. It was just one thing building up. My roommate was using all of my makeup without asking, and I was just so embarrassed about this giant pity party that I was throwing for myself. So of course, I did what I always do, I vented about everything in my diary. I was just pouring my thoughts onto pages to get them out of my head, and some are tangible. And eventually I got back to work and opened the reading room, and then I opened Catherine’s diary. I’ll never forget the first line of the first entry that I read. It was “I’m an utterly inert mass of protoplasm.” Catherine had been sick for two weeks. She was finally finding time to write after being released from the military infirmary, she returned to her quarters to discover that the lipstick that the military required women to wear, red shade number 23, was gone having been stolen by somebody. She felt sad that she wasn’t visited by any of her friends. She was worried they didn’t like her, even though she found out later that they were just part of a military training exercise that day, and she signed off the entry saying that she was sick of being sick, exactly word for word like I had in mine the night before. Reading it was somewhat unnerving. I was seeing myself reflected back at me through the words of a woman whose job it was to note down models and descriptions of planes that were flying overhead in this tiny, palm sized notebook that she covered in wool so that it camouflage perfectly into her clothing while she was walking around the city. When I had time throughout the work days, I kept reading and the similarities just kept seeping through. When an electrician came to my apartment, they accidentally broke something so meaningful to me, but I clamped down my emotions, because I could tell how badly he felt about it. I knew it was just an accident. So of course, then that night, I wrote again my diary about it. In one of her next centuries, Catherine complained that during a nighttime raid in London, she wanted to “positively strangle another woman in the bunker who couldn’t stop screaming,” and then she felt so guilty for saying that, because she knew it was a pretty proportional response to bombs raining down from the sky.
And it was around this time that I began to wonder if the diaries were shaping themselves to my experience like this Narnia gateway, except instead of a winter wonderland, I was reading really uncannily similar thoughts from a woman calculating places likely to be targeted for missiles, but I realized that these similarities were indicative of a very different and equally wonderful truth, which is that we’re so messy, we’re beautifully messy. We can be embarrassed that we’re concerned with our makeup looks while a world war rages outside, or were lonely and sick and don’t want to vent about it out loud. And I really expected to find this story of covert adventure that I could live through vicariously. But instead, I found something that I really needed. These thoughts that she was pouring on pages in wartime, while she put on such a different face for this world that she was trying so hard to save, and she accomplished astounding, courageous things during and after the war. But in writing these diary entries, she made me feel so much less alone, no matter how different our lives were. Sometimes while I was reading Catherine’s diary, I find myself tracing the words. It’s a terrible preservation practice, especially in the winter when you have lotion and oil on your hands. But I didn’t even realize I was doing it. I just felt so emotionally connected to them. And weeks later, I helped a patron page the letters belonging to Julia Child, famous chef working in France. And at one point, I looked up and saw that they were tracing the words of the letters exactly like I had with Catherine’s diaries. And it made me so happy to see them connected to them in that way. And I watched them, and couldn’t help but hope that maybe they were reading a bit of unexpected messiness, instead of very perfectly planned, almost ready to be published French recipes. That maybe they were finding not what they expected, but what they needed, which in my case, was a new passion and profession, and I think that’s something that really can only be found in archives.
On February 14th, 2025, the Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) offered a storytelling event called “Finding Aid to My Soul: For the Love of Archives.” This is one of the stories shared during that event.
Daydream of an Undergraduate Hustle Monster
So picture this. It’s 2008, I’m a freshman undergrad taking classes full time and juggling five part time jobs to stay afloat. Computer lab assistant, Jimmy John’s sandwich technician, television studio lab instructor, monster makeup artist for Reaper’s Realm Haunted Attractions and my favorite job of them all, a student worker in the university library. I’m shelving books, helping patrons doing reference things, the usual stuff. But twice a day during head counts and book pickups, I would walk past this door with a tiny window in the southwest corner of the library. Peering through the window was this serene looking room full of natural light, peaceful, magical even, I peek through the glass and think, “Wow. Imagine working there,” one job full time, in that beautiful, mysterious space.
Fast forward to my junior year, a new archivist shows up, and he seemed to enjoy the days I came to campus dressed as a zombie. One day, he pulled me aside to give me a gift from his wife’s biology lab, a replica human skull. In hindsight, I realized this may have been a bribe of sorts, because shortly thereafter, he asked me for assistance in the room with sunny serenity. The sunny serenity room was the archives. They have me sorting through old collections, cutting out newspaper clippings, things like that. I’m hooked. I never really thought about archives before, what they were, what they do, what they are, what they do. But suddenly I can’t stop thinking about how and why they preserve history and keep stories alive in such a great way. And after I graduated, I was hired back in the library part time as a clerk, not in the archives, just general stuff. But then out of nowhere, the archivist and their assistant left, like poof gone, and suddenly I’m in the archives alone. Temporarily, of course. I remember thinking, “what am I doing here?” And more importantly, “what can I do to remain here?”
So, I got to work. I read everything I could about archives and special collections, taught myself the basics and tried to figure it out as I went. There was definitely a learning curve, and there were definitely moments where I thought, “This isn’t going to work. I can’t memorize all of this stuff.” But then the director always had my back. She saw what I was doing, and she believed in me, and eventually I even learned what a finding aid was. The director hired a new archivist in 2013. A few months later, I became the archive’s clerk. Around that time, the two of them were asked by another department that anyone in the library had a background in art. I painted in my free time. So they dropped my name and told me I’d be assisting with unloading a truck containing a photography exhibit worth more than my life. Little did we know that they actually signed me up to curate the exhibit, curate as a clerk with less than a year of experience. Almost a decade later, in 2022 I was promoted to assistant archivist, a job I used to think was way out of my league.
Here’s the thing, when I was a student worker, staring into the archives room, I thought it was just a pretty place to be. A quiet, sunny room, but now it’s not just a lovely space. It’s where I found my career. It’s where I found my passion, and every time I step into it, I still feel that same wonder I did as a student. Only now it’s not the daydream of an undergraduate hustle monster. It’s my life, and I’m advocating for UV window film.
On February 14th, 2025, the Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) offered a storytelling event called “Finding Aid to My Soul: For the Love of Archives.” This is one of the stories shared during that event.
Watching her Die in a Finding Aid: An Archivist’s Duty
In the fall of 2013, I was a poet in Portland, Maine struggling to find a community of poets. Being a poet is lonely enough as it is, but a poet without a community is loneliness squared. Then I saw a notice for memorial of Maine’s first poet laureate, Kate Barnes. I was still pretty new to the state, and I had never heard of her, but my girlfriend was a big fan of the folk singer Gordon Bach, and he was on the program. So even though it was an hour up the coast, we decided we’d go. The event was in the Lincoln Theater in Damariscotta. An 1875 grand hall, it still has the plaster rosettes on the vaulted ceiling where the kerosene chandeliers used to hang. From the moment we walked in, it was like the psychic universe had opened and all the weirdos and lovers of language poured out. And I began to listen to them one by one, poems and stories. I particularly remember poet Steven Petroff. Disheveled, shuffling up to the stage, casually sipping a Diet Coke as he delivered the most tender rendition of Kate Barnes’s poem,“Inside the Stone”. The whole event was warm and welcoming, and it was hosted by booksellers Beth Leonard and Gary Lawless. Gary is also a poet, and he looked like a cross between Allen Ginsberg and Gandalf. I thought to myself, “these are my people.” And before long, I began to see them around, and would go to their readings, and they came to mine. And the Diet Coke guy. He became a friend, and amazingly, now I live down the road from Gary and Beth. But back then, three years after the memorial service, my now wife saw a job posting archivist for the Maine Women Writers Collection. She said to me, “can you do that job?” Despite not having a library degree, I had enough experience in literary archives to get the job. And one of my first projects was to process the papers of, you guessed it, Maine’s first poet laureate, Kate Barnes. Here was her literary life spread out in form in front of me in plastic bins, letters nibbled on by mice and poems scrawled on the back of shopping lists. It was now my job to care take the legacy of the woman who introduced me to the community that I was so looking for and helped me feel at home in Maine. I may not have met her in-person, but I would ensure that others got the chance to meet her in the archives.
And since I’m a poet, I want to continue the story with a poem I wrote. It’s called “Archivist Job Description”. [You can listen to Jefferson Navicky’s poem on the Finding Aid to My Soul event recording.]
On February 14th, 2025, the Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) offered a storytelling event called “Finding Aid to My Soul: For the Love of Archives.” This is one of the stories shared during that event.
Before I was Me
I was born in Vinh Long, a rural port [province] in the Mekong Delta in South Vietnam. As an infant, I was brought to Saigon to an orphanage operated by Friends For All Children, an organization based in Boulder, Colorado. On April 3, 1975 after Ed Daly, who was the president of World Airways, chartered an unauthorized flight evacuating orphans from Vietnam. President Ford initiated Operation Babylift to evacuate over 3,000 children, A C-5, a cargo plane was loaded with children, the infants in the troop compartment and the older children military crew, press and volunteers were on the floor in the cargo department.12 minutes after takeoff, the rear cargo door hydraulics failed. Bud Trainor, the pilot, maneuvered the plane to head back towards Saigon. The plane crashed into the rice paddy, bounced over the Saigon River, crash landed on the other side, breaking into pieces. Survivors, including me, I was nine months old at the time, were rescued, stabilized and flown to the US. We arrived in the Presidio in San Francisco, and I grew up on a beautiful farm in Kauai in Hawaii. The Presidio arrival was the first video capture of Operation Babylift, as President Ford greeted the children and 2020 aired the segment. I have no parental birth records. I have no hospital bracelet. I just have a front-page newspaper article and these news clips that we recorded. Over the years, I used Operation Babylift for school reports. I collected books, VHS, tapes of anything we’ve got on TV. There were documentaries, there were magazines, anything I could find. Little did I know that these were going to become the archives of my life. Books were published, published memoirs by adoptees, families of adoptees. There was a Nat Geo documentary, independent films, different websites would pop up, and personal blogs. This was a start that made the story a little more personal. But I felt like the story was always something that was told by others. It was never truly mine.
I have no parental birth records. I have no hospital bracelet. I just have a front-page newspaper article and these news clips that we recorded.
In the early 2000s, social media started to connect the adoptees, adding a whole other dimension to the story. But Trainor, who was the pilot of the C-5, a plane that crashed, he told me, “I don’t want this history to disappear when I do.” That was last year. He had started [a] Facebook page in 2010 and it was called the C-5 a galaxy, but Babylift. And on that, people started to share stories. They started to share histories. They identified the place the faces in the different photos, the pilot and others that were in service actually commented on all of the crash photos adding a narrative of their own to these images that we had seen publicly for years.
There was a passenger manifest of civilians that was released by the Air Force, and it was a list that I had for years since, like high school reports. It was a publicly released list, but all of a sudden that list was no longer just names. It was real. For example, on one of the manifest lists that was the volunteers, it says line 34 and 35 “mom and dad both died in the crash,” and all of a sudden, the death of that loss became real. They became real people, and not just names.
They became real people, and not just names.
As the 50th anniversary of Operation Babylift approaches–that will be this April 4 this year, ‘25–I wanted to help preserve history. I was talking to Mary Nell Gage, who was a part of a part of Friends For All Children on-site in Vietnam when I was an infant, and she helped facilitate many of the adoptions, including mine, and continues to support us through her work. She lives in Denver, Colorado. The records that we had when she was in Vietnam and others, the records were actually destroyed when all the on-site adoption records were destroyed, when the Operation shut down at the end of the war. The records that were personally held by the director of friends for all children, Rosemary Taylor, were recycled upon her passing. In December, I moved about 33 boxes up three flights of stairs from Mary Nell. And I joked with her, as after we moved all the boxes up, and I said, “Do you think my file’s in there?” And she said, “Somewhere.” I mean, there’s 33 boxes full of files.
Later, at dinner, she went up and grabbed a stack of files, plopped them on the table, and I reached for the first one, and I opened it up. “Mommy!” Holy shit. It was mine. It was my mother’s handwriting. It was her application to adopt a child. It had home studies. It had the process and checklists. It had a receipt for me. It had letters, all of the pieces of my story before I was me. And then I was given a list of the plane crash survivors by a woman who wrote a book about Operation Babylift and that I had found on Facebook. She emailed me the PDF, and we looked at it together. I went down the list with her, and there it was, Mimosa. That was me. I was on the list. I was there. This was in the basement in Colorado for decades. And finally, this was my story. Those boxes weren’t just records, they’re proof that we existed and that we mattered. Preserving these stories ensures adoptees like me can finally find their truth. That is my love story of my life and archives.
On February 14th, 2025, the Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) offered a storytelling event called “Finding Aid to My Soul: For the Love of Archives.” This is one of the stories shared during that event.
The Last of the Thursday Morning Crew
Between the ages of about 11 to 15, I spent every Thursday morning having coffee with my grandpa and his friends. I would wake up early, he’d pick me up, and we’d drive downtown to the local bakery. He’d buy me a giant cinnamon roll, he’d get his coffee, and we’d sit around a table with his friends, where they would spend the next few hours solving the world’s problems or just talking about their week before or the week coming up.
None of these men understood why this young girl enjoyed spending her Thursday mornings with them. And to be honest, I never really thought much about it. I enjoyed hearing their stories. I enjoyed feeling like a part of the group. It made me feel special. But really, I just liked spending time with my grandpa. Over the years, I heard 1000s of stories, and to be honest, I can’t tell you a single one today, but I did learn about these four old men.
I enjoyed hearing their stories.
There was Ted, who was a pilot, a telegrapher, a photographer, and he learned how to cut cakes in the Navy, which he brought up every birthday as he passed out these beautifully cut pieces around the table.
There was Tom, who was a less frequent attendee of these meetings, but he was calm and always listening. I know a little less about him. I know he worked for the University, and for some reason, my young mind always equated him to a turtle. Don’t ask me why, but I still think of him as a turtle today.
There was Dick, who was a postman who loved discussing the rural routes on the edge of town and the best way to get from point A to point B. And well into his 70s, was prided himself on the fact that he still had brown hair while everyone else on the table, par me, was gray or going bald.
And then there was Louis. He was my favorite. He was my grandpa’s best friend. He had served in the army, he had driven [a] truck, and he spent the latter years of his life helping others, most notably the widow of his former employer.
Eventually, I started public high school and Thursday mornings were no longer my own, but every school break, you would find me at that table with those men, discussing the world and the town and everything in between. And eventually I started college, and a couple years in, I lost the first, Louis. Broke my heart. By the time I had finished grad school, I was the last of the Thursday morning crew left, which is a side-effect of being 60 years junior of your friends, but I think of them often to this day and drink coffee on all of their birthdays.
I think of them often to this day and drink coffee on all of their birthdays.
I eventually got a job at my local university archive, and in the following years, I was able to have coffee with each of these men again, at least once, if not a few times.
The most frequent was Ted, who I initially found in a college yearbook. A photograph with him having a camera around his neck, he had served on the yearbook staff. This was before World War Two, when he left to serve, and he never returned to the university to get his degree. But he did return to town and became the photographer, and I often found [him] developing envelopes and local collections I was processing.
And then there was Tom, who I had found in some staff and faculty photographs from the 60s, as I rehoused them. Turns out he had been a counselor at the university, which contradicted my memory of him being an AG professor, which goes to show that I might not have always been paying the closest attention on Thursday mornings.
There was Dick, who I didn’t necessarily find in the archive, though I’m sure he’s there somewhere. But every time I needed to move exhibit cases from one part of campus to another, we used his son’s moving company, and every time I saw the truck, I smiled.
And then there was Louis. Again I didn’t find him exactly, but I did find his parents, who had participated in an oral history project in the 70s, discussing their migration from Italy to the rural area and their experiences there raising their family. I had no idea he was the son of Italian immigrants, but it made sense.
Through my time in the archives. Over those years, I got to have coffee at least once with each of these men which bring brought joy to my heart and to this day, every time, every morning, I drive to work, and I see in a restaurant window backlit a group of old men sitting around a table drinking coffee, and it’s all my heart’s desire to pull over and see if I can join and maybe help them solve some of the world’s problems.
This interview with Thomas Padilla was conducted at the end of May 2025.
Because the status of IMLS, as well as many other federally funded institutions, continues to be in flux, while every attempt was made to keep details as current as possible, we anticipate there will be changes, even shortly after publication.
1. Tell us a little bit about yourself and the work you do.
I am a librarian, community builder, and technologist who has worked in a number of different kinds of organizations (e.g., academic libraries, national libraries, research library consortia, global nonprofit digital libraries). A good deal of my work has focused on fostering community capacity around responsible computational development and use of memory organization collections – think AI, data science, digital scholarship and so on. That work has entailed significant commitments to local, national, and international advocacy.
These days I wear a couple of different hats. I am the founder of a consultancy called Bristlecone Strategy where I work with partners in cultural heritage, higher education, and government. I also work as the Public Interest AI Strategist for the Authors Alliance. With Authors Alliance specifically, I work on a Mellon Foundation supported project called The Public Interest Corpus. This is an effort to develop a practical, community-vested startup plan that provides a path for multi-organizational development of library, archive, and museum collection corpora that support public interest AI research and development as well as computational research more generally.
2. Can you explain your work on IMLS Matters? (What inspired you to start it? What was your hope for the project?)
Like many working in libraries and higher education, I have found the last few months to be quite challenging. The Trump Administration is implementing a premeditated, comprehensive assault on our communities. Disciplinary researchers and students are being attacked. Librarians are being attacked directly and indirectly through things like proposed changes to Public Service Loan Forgiveness that rely on an ideological litmus test. The financial stability of our organizations is being attacked through attempts to revoke tax-exempt status and drastic, damaging reductions to indirect cost rates.
As we know, the Trump Administration is also working to eliminate the sole source of Federal funding dedicated to libraries and museums. Thankfully a number of court cases are starting to weaken this part of the the administration’s effort to dismantle our country’s public interest information infrastructure. As a result, Institute of Museum and Library Services Staff (IMLS) have begun to return to office and some grants have been restored. Optimism about this change in status must be tempered by the fact that the Trump Administration has already filed an appeal. Optimism must be further tempered by the fact that the Trump Administration’s fiscal year 2026 budget request includes proposed elimination of IMLS, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts.
Some might argue that private philanthropy can fill the Federal funding gap for libraries, but that is simply not the case. Private philanthropic funding tends to be project or initiative based while Federal funding scales to all States and Territories, supporting a combination of operating costs and project-based costs. Significant portions of funding that appear to people throughout the country as State-funded efforts are actually funds that have long come to States via Federal funding from IMLS.
Ending IMLS would be a multigenerational disaster.
My heart breaks for all the library school graduates going into a world without IMLS funding and those kinds of opportunities to allow them to take their careers to the next level.
Anonymous Federal Employee
On April 1, I started IMLS Matters, as a place for community members affected by the attack on IMLS to share stories of how IMLS matters to them. Rather than create another direct advocacy effort – both ALA and EveryLibrary had those bases covered – I thought it would be useful to create a space that fosters solidarity among our community using one of the oldest technologies we have – our stories. I hoped that pooling our stories would strengthen us as we work to fight while also creating a collective resource that helps communicate the impact of the attack on IMLS to a broader public.
Within a couple of weeks more than 50 stories were submitted to the site from ~20 traditionally “red” and “blue” States. These stories help prove the non-partisan value of libraries and the work they do to advance an informed, thriving public.
The attack on IMLS is an attempt to relegate our communities to a knowledge ecosystem that is forced to toe the line with the current administration’s often regressive prerogatives. It has been deeply disturbing to see the Trump Administration force removal of books from military libraries corresponding with 20 Library of Congress Subject Headings including but not limited to: Affirmative Action, Allyship, Anti-Racism, Critical Race Theory, Diversity in the Workplace, Gender Identity and so on.
The stakes of actions like this become clearer when we consider what is being promoted in opposition to each of the above subject headings. What is the opposite of affirmative action? What is the opposite of allyship? What is the opposite of anti-racism?
One can easily imagine that the administration would like to extend this kind of knowledge manipulation throughout the country. We cannot let that happen.
Without IMLS, I fear that libraries won’t be able to afford the connectivity they need without significant cuts to other library services.
anon.
3. What has been the reaction/responses to the project? (From readers? From submitters? Your reaction to all of the responses?)
The response to IMLS Matters has been overwhelmingly positive. Some have shared that they shed tears while reading the stories. My sense is that those tears represent firm resolve to defend our community and the communities we serve.
I think of committing effort to things like IMLS Matters as an attempt to “cast a spark in the dark”, which always feels a bit scary.
Will people see the spark before it is lost to the night? Will they reach to grab it, cup it in their hands, and steward the spark from a flame to a fire that provides a measure of safety in difficult times? Time has shown that people have seen the spark and are using it to light lamps across the country. I feel good about that.
Behind each IMLS grant is a story — that leads to more stories.
4. In this political environment, do you worry about bad actors trying to disrupt the gathering of these testimonies?
The past few years have taught me to be less worried about bad actors, and focus instead on being prepared. When we worry endlessly about bad actors they win. We are better served by making sure we are prepared to do the work we need to do.
5. Again, given the political climate, what steps have you taken to help protect anyone who shares their views? Are submitters able to do so anonymously?
Good questions. The primary strategy I’ve adopted is to be open about my intent to publicly share these stories and to also allow anonymous submissions. I am deeply aware that it feels dangerous at this time to share, and each individual has a different threat calculation that they need to weigh as it pertains to their work, life, and wellbeing. For those able to do so, I encourage you to share your story at IMLS Matters. I encourage everyone to follow ALA’s advocacy work and voice their support for libraries to their representatives.
This is the newest post in our “So You Wanna Be An Archivist,” series, where archivists and other information professionals describe their path to the profession. In this article, COPA member Angie Piccolo interviews Kathryn Hoogendoorn about their path to becoming the Digitization Specialist for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C.
Q: Please describe your current position.
Kathryn: I am the Digitization Specialist for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C. Basically, I am a program manager for digitization of paper and object digitization. It is a large cross-office effort that requires extensive communication and logistics with all of our divisions.
Q: What drew you to the profession?
Kathryn: I think aspirations toward access and education of the general public were my biggest draws to the profession, as well as the cool stuff you get to see! I have always had a special place in my heart for historical documents and books.
Q: Can you describe your education background and work experience?
Kathryn: My route into archives is circuitous at best. In the beginning, I had wide-eyed dreams of being a chemist and I hold a BS in Chemistry. I have always been an avid collector of antique books but I never thought I could combine my hobby and degree. One day, I happened upon a historical library where I struck up a conversation with a conservator and realized I could! As I pursued conservation, my mentor suggested a Masters in Library and Information Science (MLIS). to start as an archivist and obtain certification in conservation. That sounded like a great plan, so I obtained my MLIS. I loved being an archivist so much, I never went back for my certifications.
Through the years, my career has taken me from working with the archival collection for long term preservation to focusing on digitization and digital access. I have worked as an archival assistant, a lone arranger for a corporation, a paper digitizer and now I am the lead for a digitization program focused on digital access. Digitization provides a rewarding, hands-on approach to the collection and how it is used in real time.
Photo Description and Credit: ‘One of the Museum’s digitization stations. US Holocaust Memorial Museum’
Q: What skill has been the most valuable in your career?
Kathryn: Picking just one skill is difficult, but flexibility and the ability to turn an idea into real work have been very valuable.
Archives are at the whim of many outside forces including budgets, Federal direction and donors. It’s important to be able to change priorities or workflows without letting it disrupt your sense of passion for the work.
Taking an idea like “these departments should work together to achieve a goal” may be easy to say, but difficult to articulate on paper and to implement. This is a project management skill that has been highly valuable in my career.
Q: What advice would you give to someone trying to enter into this field?
Kathryn: A passion for access, history, preservation and curiosity are key to being in this field. You won’t make millions, but you will have a very rewarding career.
I always advise students going into archival studies to look at their bachelor’s degree and go for a secondary interest like education, science or public administration. These degrees do not prevent you from obtaining your archives related Master’s degree, but they do provide a foundation of skills and knowledge that will be invaluable.
Ask around. Archivists love to share!
Consider the digital side of archives. It may not sound as glamorous, but we have a really great time and there are constantly new developments making the work more and more interesting every day.
The Society of American Archivists (SAA) has made a concerted effort to respond to each new affront to archivists and cultural heritage workers as well as to share resources to support impacted archivists. To amplify and encourage wider distribution of this information and to raise awareness of the organization’s stance on current events, this post will collate recent updates from SAA leadership (as of March 19, 2025).
The leadership of the Society of American Archivists (SAA) is alarmed by the dismissal of the Archivist of the United States on February 7, 2025. We believe the removal of AOTUS with no stated cause does harm to our nation and its people. The Society wants to reassure our colleagues across the profession that we continue to support the mission of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to preserve and provide access to the essential records of the federal government.
As archivists, we adhere to a set of core values that champion accountability and social responsibility and promote preservation, access, and use. Protecting the integrity of the federal record and affirming the work of those who care for it aligns with our professional codes and responsibilities.
SAA will continue to monitor the situation at NARA and will actively work to support NARA workers and archivists across the United States. In the meantime, we want to remind you that your voice matters; please take a few minutes to contact your legislators today.
It’s all in the details. When advocating, use statistics and facts to help support your claims. Tell your representatives and senators why the safekeeping of government archives is essential to a free and healthy democracy. Call or write to them to share how national archives change lives.
Some examples include:
preserving and promoting our nation’s foundational documents,
giving veterans access to their personnel records to secure benefits,
connecting with your family’s history,
teaching students about the history of the United States, and
studying and understanding the human experience.
SAA will continue to support our NARA colleagues by contacting policymakers directly about the importance of government archives and records management. We appreciate the voices of the many SAA members who have reached out to us over the past few days and stand with you as partners in advocacy.
The Society of American Archivists condemns the decision of the White House to terminate substantial numbers of archivists and cultural heritage workers at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the National Park Service, and other government agencies.
All federal employees who work with archives serve a vital function for the United States. The White House’s staffing decisions, which compromise the livelihoods of thousands of individuals, jeopardize the preservation and access to the evidence that safeguards individuals’ rights, documents government actions, and ensures transparency. The actions can be seen as threatening the independence of NARA, thereby creating a risk that public servants can evade accountability. Federal archives are foundational infrastructure for a democratic society and should serve their non-partisan function without political interference.
SAA strongly urges Congress to assert their prerogatives, retain Congressionally authorized staffing levels, and preserve Congressionally legislated agency independence.
SAA Council extends our support and solidarity to impacted workers. The Council is actively working to determine how best to support federal archival workers during this time. We welcome impacted workers to contact SAA regarding how we can best provide support: president@archivists.org.
According to multiplenewsreports, USAID workers have been ordered to destroy or burn records, including classified records. Current reporting indicates conflicting information on whether the agency is in compliance with the Federal Records Act, which governs records from executive branch agencies.
With the many current federal actions targeting the reduction and elimination of federal agencies, the Society of American Archivists notes that such actions increase the risk of non-compliance with the Federal Records Act across federal agencies. Federal statute (44 U.S. Code § 3105) and regulations require agency heads to prevent the unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records. The swift shuttering of USAID raises questions as to the proper disposition of that agency’s records, including ensuring permanent records are transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Furthermore, SAA supports all federal staff in their effort to uphold the rules and statutes governing the management of records and archives.
Federal courts have been asked to intervene on this and other White House efforts to undermine records management and archives activities. SAA will continue to monitor these developments.
We encourage SAA members and all who care about the importance of government archives to contact their elected members of Congress with the following key messages:
Congress must ensure robust accountability of executive branch agencies through strengthened federal records laws.
This series celebrates all the great information that exists in ArchivesAWARE!
This post originally published on December 12, 2016, was authored by guest contributor Meredith E. Torre, Archivist at the Atlanta Housing Authority. It describes using a Pokémon scavenger hunt to celebrate American Archives month.
Photo provided by Rachel Thomas.
To celebrate October’s Archives month, the Atlanta Housing Authority (AHA) Archives recently launched a historically themed Pokémon scavenger hunt. The game was designed to celebrate some of the important people who have contributed to AHA’s history.
This outreach activity was great at eliciting responsive participation, generating conversation, and demonstrating some of the papers and records the AHA Archives holds for people valuable to our history.
An assortment of Pokémon cards featuring notable individuals.
The fabrication of the game was fairly simple. The game was created entirely out of paper “Pokémon” cards, with corresponding stickers (to show how rare or common that particular Pokémon was) attached to the Pokémon, and a Pokéball or scorecard. Because the game was setup like a scavenger hunt and the score card resembled a bingo card, no knowledge of the actual Pokémon game was necessary to play the game.
The Pokémon cards consisted of biographical information for persons who are a significant part of AHA’s history—Charles F. Palmer, Dr. John Hope, Harold L. Ickes, Jesse Blayton, Clark Howell, and President Roosevelt, just to name a few—and corresponding stickers. These Pokémon were posted throughout AHA’s building. The object of the game was to locate the Pokémon (the person of historical significance) and to “catch” the Pokémon by placing the corresponding sticker onto a scorecard or your Pokéball. In the actual game of Pokémon, some Pokémon are common and some are rarer than others. We printed out less Pokémon cards for those person in our history we identified as already familiar and made them “rare”. On the contrary, we printed out more Pokémon cards for those persons perhaps less familiar and placed them in more prominent places to make them “common” and to give them more exposure.
Pokéball Scorecard
In creating the game, there are lots of Pokémon templates online to choose from. We selected a blank card template created by artist Christian England (LevelInfinitum) on Deviant Art to create our Pokémon cards and edited the images using Pixlr. We created our scorecards as a Word document and printed an image of a Pokéball on the opposite side.
We announced the Pokémon activity and posted the rules with scorecards in centralized locations. We held the game for a period of one week. There was a lot of enthusiasm for the activity and people said in hunting for the Pokémon that they really enjoyed discovering the people who make up a part of AHA’s history and learning things about them they may have not known!
Completed Pokémon card created for Susie Labord, AHA’s first resident commissioner.
Pokémon themed prizes were awarded in a drawing for the hunters who collected the most Pokémon and to the hunter who collected the Legendary Pokémon, AHA’s first resident commissioner, Susie LaBord.
This outreach activity was easy to coordinate, super fun, and is also easily customizable for your institution!
Have you developed an innovative outreach program at your repository? If so, please share in the comments below or contact archivesaware@archivists.org to be a guest contributor to ArchivesAWARE!